Here is an excerpt from WS's paper. What are its strengths? How could he empower it?
"The Nazca Lines were a large part pf Latin American architecture in and of themselves, but later Latin America also focused their culture partly around architecture, particularly color within architectural structures. At excavation sites and still intact monuments and temples dispersed throughout Latin Americas, there is a meticulousness about the role of color that rivals the intricancy of the Nazca Lines. Regarding the Pyramid of the Niches in El Taijin, the Impact of Colour and Sound reads, '...an extraordinary impression because of the contrast of light and shadow in 365 apertures of the structure. Archaeologists report that its appearance in its prime would have been even more remarkable, for they have found traces of the dark red paint that originally coloured the interior of each niche and of the bright turquoise that bordered each one.' While the focus architecturally differs between the Nazca and later Latin America, the attention to detail and effort remains. Continuing with similarities, both the Nazca and the Aztecs, Mayans, etc focused the efforts of the architecture on giving praise to the gods. The Impact of Colour and Sound states, 'The use of coloured paints enhanced the messages of divine, dynastic, or military power represented by sacred and other ceremonial buildings. The northern shrine to Tlaloc was painted blue and white to signify his powers over water.' It is apparent that both the Aztec and eventually all of Latin America would regard architecture as a chief vehicle of furthering their religious faith both over the long term and on a daily basis."
Will made a very interesting argument in relation to the detail that Latin Americans put forth. He does a great job of describing how the color and sound tie into the Latin American mindset.
ReplyDeleteWill makes great points here. I think his greatest strength in this particular excerpt is his use of generalization. He does so though in a way that is explanatory. He provides specific examples, in regards to the Nazcas and Aztecs, only to connect them to the Mayans along with all of Latin America, past and present. In doing so he had to make many connections which he did. The ability to do so is a great strength as it is difficult to accomplish which is why I believe this is a great argument.
ReplyDeleteThis is a great piece, i really enjoyed how Will initiated his writing with a reference to the Nazca lines and then expands upon that statement to other cultures and other marvels. The quote was well chosen because it really helps fulfill some pieces of information that Will was missing that really could have helped further his argument but because of the quote it was included.
ReplyDeleteThis is well written, but almost excessive. I felt lost reading the explanation. I think there was too much detail that it all got mixed up. However, i could be wrong. I just feel as though if he had an average audience that they may get confused. Well written, just a little to complex unless that was his intended purpose.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Joe. I got a little confused because of the amount of comparisons that Will was making.
Delete